Lawyer Seeks to Relocate Trial for University of Mississippi Student’s Killing
OXFORD, Miss.
A legal representative for Sheldon “Timothy” Herrington Jr., charged with the murder of a popular local university student, has put in a request to move the upcoming trial due to concerns over prospective jury bias. The attorney argues that the high-profile nature of the case and the subsequent publicity could interfere with the jury’s impartiality.
Concerns About Jury Impartiality
In a court filing made on Monday, attorney Kevin Horan requested that the capital murder trial be moved out of its current location in Lafayette County, where the University of Mississippi is situated. It was here that Jimmy “Jay” Lee, a well-known figure in the local LGBTQ community, vanished on July 8, 2022. In a twist that has captivated local attention, Lee’s body has yet to be found, and his disappearance and subsequent suspected murder has instilled fear in the local LGBTQ community.
Killing Linked to Defendant
The absence of Lee’s body has not impeded the investigation. Authorities found evidence of a disturbing nature on Herrington’s cellphone. According to investigators, they discovered records showing Herrington communicating with Lee on the morning of his disappearance. Herrington also reportedly searched online about international travel and “how long it takes to strangle someone,” within minutes after Lee informed him that he was on his way to his apartment.
Suspicious Activity
Adding to the mounting evidence against Herrington, the authorities also utilized surveillance footage that recorded his suspicious actions on that fateful day. Cameras captured Herrington fleeing from the location where Lee’s car was later discovered. Later, he was seen acquiring a shovel and a wheelbarrow at his parents’ house. Despite the mounting evidence against him, Herrington continues to maintain his innocence.
Legal Wranglings Continue
In light of the sensitive nature of the case, the legal proceedings continue to draw intense scrutiny from all corners. The court has yet to rule on the defense’s motion to relocate the trial. It remains to be seen whether these proceedings will garner the same degree of public interest if they were to be relocated. This case serves as a stark reminder of the enduring questions of justice, equality, and safety for all members of society.
